[ a / b / cf / cy / g / lain / un ] [ fresh / meta ] [ home / rules / faq / affiliates ]

/a/ - Anime

Anime/Manga, Japanese Culture.
Name
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Hop in to our IRC channel! #wirechan@rizon.net

File: 1621305985855.jpeg (4.33 KB, 266x190, images.jpeg)

 No.239

accidentally called a kid walking past me at walmart a loli out loud…

 No.240

File: 1621316436501.png (797.94 KB, 2039x1631, wp4747930.png)

Like this?
*Loli walking past you*
You: Hi loli.
Loli: Nani?
*You go away*

or like this

*Loli walkin past you*
You: LOLI!
Loli: Mama this weird guy wants a lolipop…

 No.241

>>240
It wouldn't mistake lohlee for lolly

 No.242

>>239
commit suicide pedo

 No.243

>>242
not op but I always think the term loli, when I see smol kids and I have absolutely no desires towards children. I think stuff like that happens to a lot of lurking weebs, without any connection to being pedophile.

 No.244

File: 1621457954015.jpg (1.34 MB, 1697x1200, yande.re 601448 cleavage f….jpg)

>>243
The term "loli" originally reffered to "cute eroticism" of underage anime girls but it became a general term for underage anime girls.

 No.245

>>243
If you are given the choice between consuming pornographic material involving fictional adults and pornographic material involving fictional prepubescent children and you choose the prepubescent children, I'm going to eye you heavy. I wouldn't let my kids hang around someone who openly admits to watching loli.

People who are interested in kids or lolis tend to be social rejects. The thought of manipulating a younger and more susceptible mind to become their partners is very alluring to them, because they lack the skills to have real relationships and take up real responsibilities.

That is why all the "headpatting" and "onii-chan" shit is still very creepy, even without sexual undertones. It implies child grooming, which no functional adult would be interested in.

 No.246

>>245
You must be braindead. Is this the "virtue signaling" described to social media? Are you the type of person to get all of your information from the New York Times and Twitter? If so, please leave -even if you are not a closet pedophile.

 No.247

>>246
pedo detected

 No.248

>>246
How its that virtuous at all, its the fucking bare minimum you autistic waste of space, has the wired pozzed your brain so much that you think dunking on pedos its a saint characteristic?

Even the most lowlife scumbag murderer prison dweller will clap a pedo on sight simply for pest control. Is like stepping on roaches, nobody wants them around, not for some altruistic reasoning, but for the fact that they are disgusting pests and no sane person wants them around.

 No.249

>>248
>How its that virtuous at all
Virtue signaling is when you dunk on pedos, murderers, etc. to affirm to others and your fragile ego that you are not a bad person but a good person. Normalfags are like bots. Regardless of the topic, when they see the code word, they will assert their own moral superiority and then attempt to make an illuminating observation to make them not seem like bots.

 No.250

>>249
by saying fucking kids its bad?

Hell yeas they are morally superior, do you
disagree?

its either, fucking kids its good or fucking kids its bad.

Regardless of people tooting their own horn and egofeeding, does it change the morality of fucking kids?
Does it change the guttural disgust people feel when they see a tranny pedo?

Yea people wanna look good in the eyes of others instead of looking like pedomurderers, DUH, more news at 11, tune in on the newyorktimes for more.

 No.251

>>250
>does it change the morality of fucking kids?
Nobody is arguing against the fact that fucking kids is bad. The problem is using "not op but I always think the term loli, when I see smol kids and I have absolutely no desires towards children" to feed your ego and validate yourself on an anonymous imageboard.
>Yea people wanna look good in the eyes of others instead of looking like pedomurderers
It's an anonymous imageboard though. Besides why would you look like a pedomurderer?

 No.252

>>251
>1
its a discussion board wirenon just gave his opinion, as self wacking as it its its still stimulates convo and discussion, unless you know Somebody felt unconfortable by it(in which case go back to reddit lainchan). halting all discussion all together in order to toot their own horn by saying people toot their own horn just on a different subject.

Tell me, are you a lolicon? what do you think about lolis?

>2

you tell me

 No.253

>>249
just because you can analyze how and why people do stuff doesn't change the fact that stuff has been done and you have to deal with the consequences of it, there is probably some moralfagging there, but i wouldn't be surprised that he actually hates pedos like every other person , his point still stands.

fyi when someone calls you a pedo and your response its that they're just being morally superior it makes you look extra retarded.

 No.254

>>239
brain rewired due to the lack of social interaction and meaningful relationships

Many such cases, it might be too late for you wirenon…

commit

 No.255

Get off my internet, normalfags. Who the fuck comes here or any imageboard if they have kids? Get the fuck out.

 No.256

>>245
I try not to watch pornographic material, but if I do, I watch pornographic material with women my age, maybe slightly younger, but grown-up.
I don't watch "loli", I watch anime and some of them have loli characters. And some of them are really cute, like Kanna-Chan. I don't feel sexually attracted to her in any way, I just like the mixture of grownup-intelligence with a playful character. That doesn't mean anything, my girlfriend is an adult and she is a very playful "childish" person. I like cuteism and sometimes loli characters are cute, not generally and that doesn't mean that cute is connect to young for me. You're really thinking black and white there.
I too think that grooming or any kind of sexual aggression towards children is very problematic because the way it influences the individuals psyche, that doesn't mean that I think all pedos should be gassed. I think the question about this is just a very difficult one. Besides sexual harrasment, what does people make feeling attracted towards children? How can we fix that for society? I don't know, I'd guess they need someone who really needs them to survive. Is that fixable, is that needed to be fixed? Man life is complicated and fucked up, let me enjoy my anime and make your own thoughts about topics. I assume that you have never tried to think, what life would be like, if you found out, you feel attracted towards children. I mean just imagine, suddenly you have the whole world against you. Keep your desires a secret, they are illegal. Everytime I think of that perspective, it makes me realize that our society is not working, just walking.

 No.257

File: 1622028278583.jpg (99.16 KB, 1280x720, stardust.jpg)

>>255
What's with that 4chan attitude, we come here to chill man, you are nothing behind your representation~

 No.258

File: 1622044916793.jpg (899.18 KB, 2563x4096, 52db031b3e0c4d6b1e31905133….jpg)

>>257
4chan originally had a loli board. Now normalfags who've invaded throw a hysterical, moralizing hissy fit at the mere mention of loli. Of course that pisses me off. Pic was drawn by Dragon Maid's mangaka. If you think he doesn't see Kanna in a sexual light, you're delusional.

 No.259

>>255
"My internet"

Lol look at this fag.

This is sad, literally all these people have its the internet and even here they are despised, calling everybody normal for not wanting to fuck kids, whats its their objective? to have the internet be a safe haven for pedos?(lol pozzed brain) To simulate reality through virtual means in the wired while their body and mind degrades in the real world? To make friends because they are rejected in the real world due to the lack drive and/or proper socialization?

Theres so many possible reasons and outcomes, its intriguing and disturbing and at the same time irrelevant for most…

Cyberpunk its upon us, too late to try to stop it or comprehend it too early for space frontierism or a virtual self, save yourself because nobody else will or you end up a workdrone or brainpozzed like our friend here.

 No.260

>>258
Yes and hitler originally intended to relocate jews, he still ended up gassing them. Now 4chan is a place we hide from and we don't want to bring it here. Let a man have kids and lurk, it really is a poor thought, thinking that just because imageboards are a place where you feel home and/or safe, behind every poster sits someone like you.
You see, imageboards take away social status, hierarchy and so on, only information and lulz count. And the culture will be where the synchronization of the anon happens. That doesn't mean that there are no different kind of people, with different kind of social hierarchy or status sit behind those anonymous numbers and names. That is the great thing, that we all come here to chose to leave our reallife-representation behind, that doesn't mean that we all come here with nothing to begin with.

But that doesn't mean that I see Kanna in a sexual way? It doesn't really conflict with what I said. Additionally there is the question of age of consent. In some parts of vsa you need to be 21 to not count as a child sexually, while in japan or germany 14 is okay under some circumstances. Thats a 50% difference.

 No.261

>>259
You're pretentious and there's nothing free-thinking about you.
>>260
>Now 4chan is a place we hide from
Because it was flooded by normalfags and the culture degraded accordingly. The culture wasn't great to begin with because of moot's incompetence.
>That is the great thing, that we all come here to chose to leave our reallife-representation behind
How does talking about your personal relations fit into that? As soon as you mention having kids, you're not an anon, you're a dad with the warped perspective most parents have.
>It doesn't really conflict with what I said.
Western standards of social acceptability are alien to otaku culture. People who try to enforce those standards in this kind of setting are cancerous.

 No.262

>>261
>You're pretentious
>Because it was flooded by normalfags and the culture degraded accordingly

Lol
>People who try to enforce those standards in this kind of setting are cancerous.

Whos enforcing what, nigga just made a post, if you feel strongly about it make a macro and move on

>you're a dad with the warped perspective most parents have


The warped perspective of not wanting your kids fucked by anime fatso?

You are also more than welcome to make your own webspace and kraut the rules as you see fit.

Nobody its forcing you anything, the wired its supposed to serve you not slave you.

Just take a walk outside, get some sunlight, turn it off for a bit.

 No.263

File: 1622144522853.jpeg (48.99 KB, 503x719, ff7a03ee28c2f34e0d101e066….jpeg)

>>262
>Whos enforcing what
Posts like this. >>242
Self-satisfied pigs who otherwise don't care about other people suddenly pretending to be morally virtuous because of a specific context. That's a hallmark of normalfags. Anons should only care about individuals they personally know or have a good reason to like. Poltards and other normalfags ruined that.
>The warped perspective of not wanting your kids fucked by anime fatso?
They get hot and bothered by drawings or have a trigger reaction to "loli". Their priorities are fucked up.
>make your own webspace
I'm thinking about it.

 No.264

>>261
>How does talking about your personal relations fit into that? As soon as you mention having kids, you're not an anon, you're a dad with the warped perspective most parents have.
You can talk about your personal relations while leaving your social status and place in society behind. You are talking about your perspective, so aren't you anon anymore? You're really turning reality and information around here to fit your emotional reaction.
And I'm not a dad, I'm >>260 and have nothing to do with him. I don't have kids, that doesn't mean I don't want to talk to people that don't have kids. If I'd want a place with only people like me, I'd lock myself up until I was - in a negative way - full of myself.
(1/2)

 No.265

>>261
>Western standards of social acceptability are alien to otaku culture. People who try to enforce those standards in this kind of setting are cancerous.
Bruv, I live in a western country with an age of consent of 14, so how does it interfere with otaku culture? *Interestingly* my country is entangled (due to specific historic events) to japan. What you are saying makes no sense in my reality. Maybe it counts for your country, the people you know and the experiences you've made. But it's nothing you can just force unto western society in general.
>those standards
>this kind of setting
I think you are really talking about your personal opinion here and are trying to enforce that. How is you perception of this digital room superior to those of other people? I'm not even trying to defend pedos in any kind of way, I just think that the way you are reasoning is twisted. And if people with "those kind of standards" are in "this kind of setting" maybe those things are in some how entangled?
Obviously I'm not trying to say politics and cyberpunk are entangled, but maybe free speech or thinking beyond the limitations of your local culture. Thinking about how to fix society and where it's flaws lie. Thinking about how to use society's loopholes. Man just enjoy the ride in this cyber spaceship flowing through time and space.
(2/2)

 No.266

File: 1622155724392.png (893.42 KB, 1000x1414, 7b8246d88a9babf55ee18e7b88….png)

>>264
>You can talk about your personal relations while leaving your social status and place in society behind.
It's a common belief that being in a relationship and having kids puts you higher up the social totem pole.
>>265
>I live in a western country with an age of consent of 14
I'd argue your country is an outlier in the western world and non-representative of it.
>trying to enforce that
More like venting.
>Thinking about how to fix society and where it's flaws lie
Personally I think that's impossible and even talking about it is best avoided. It stifles other topics of discussion for the sake of a placebo at best.
>Man just enjoy the ride in this cyber spaceship flowing through time and space.
Okay. Fine.

 No.267

>>266
>More like venting.
>My internet

Sad, life its more than that, much more.

>I'm thinking about it


Then make it and stop whining (Venting lol)

>They get hot and bothered by drawings or have a trigger reaction to "loli". Their priorities are fucked up.


Not "hot", disgusted, like seeing roaches yea there is more important shit going on but you can defnitely feel disgusted by them and not want them around.

>Posts like this

>Giving random words on a computer screen power over you, literal 0 and 1s.

>That's a hallmark of normalfags. Anons should only care about individuals they personally know or have a good reason to like.

Why wouldnt they care for themselves as and individual? It makes them feel good about moralfagging and it makes you feel bad, thats as good as reason as any, dont like it? tough shit.

>It's a common belief that being in a relationship and having kids puts you higher up the social totem pole.


Thats because they got something to live for.

>Personally I think that's impossible and even talking about it is best avoided.

Best part of your opinion its that its anonymous therefore worth nothing because nobody cares about you personally unless they agree with said statement also, what about free speech? I though you were up to people saying whatever even dumb and placebo shit.

 No.268

File: 1622173996852.jpg (1.36 MB, 1920x1440, f2f36aba186cd1396e050823f3….jpg)

>>267
Thanks for proving all of my points, normalfag.
>I though you were up to people saying whatever even dumb and placebo shit
In general yes, but on separate sites no. I'm for a specific, isolated culture. I want a walled garden that suits my taste and keeps outsiders out. The internet is gradually getting worse because of normal people dragging the real world into it.

 No.269

>>268
>Thanks for proving all of my points, normalfag.
Elaborate

>again you can always make your own, but heres whats gonna happen


>make website

>people go there
>wtf this is this is digusting or attract pedos
>ban the disgusting people becasue kraut
>pedoshit site

Happened many times before, techincally you dont even need to make your own you probably can find people just like you dont even have to look hard enough.

>people dragging the real world into it

You mean the world in which you are despised? Yea that must suck indeed

 No.270

>>268
>I want a walled garden that suits my taste and keeps outsiders out.

Thats called your brain, which its impossible to keep 100% original when interaction happens.

Even more impossible if you want positive interaction to happen.

I do have a solution though, a fast moving preferably lead object through it should keep it mostly how you like it.

 No.271

File: 1622177821667.jpg (263.29 KB, 680x1024, istockphoto-171578770-1024….jpg)

>>269
>>270
Here's your medal, normal faggots.

 No.272

File: 1622179287436.jpg (23.68 KB, 338x450, proudly.jpg)


 No.273

>>239
You make your own website and people that agree with you are just gonna flock there and circle jerk, basically twitter but for fedora pedos instead of tranny pedos.

 No.277

File: 1622627125924.jpg (39.94 KB, 600x600, fb6.jpg)


 No.283

>>268
>Thanks for proving all of my points, normalfag.
Wat points?



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ a / b / cf / cy / g / lain / un ] [ fresh / meta ] [ home / rules / faq / affiliates ]